Study Shows Non-Western Immigrants & Their Descendants Cost Denmark 33 Billion Crowns Annually
A recent study conducted by Denmark’s Ministry of Finance concluded that in 2014, immigrants and their descendants cost Danish taxpayers at net loss of 28 billion Crowns per year.
Furthermore, when Western immigrants were removed from the equation, the net cost rose to 33kr billion.
Compare this to tax receipts from ethnic Danes, who contributed a surplus of 56kr billion in 2014.
The data below is from the study itself, although English translations have been provided.
The report shows conclusively that immigration has been an economic disaster for Denmark.
In short: 59% of the tax surplus collected from native Danes is spent on ethnic minorities, who are a massive drain on the system.
Such shocking findings are often greeted with denial. Is the study legitimate? How is this possible?
First, the study was conducted internally by Denmark’s own finance department, in order to see exactly where Danish taxes were being spent. Furthermore, the methodology is explicit, and the data transparent.
The study is good.
Second, although the data is shocking, it is believable.
Consider that ethnic minorities, who are by definition immigrants to Denmark, represent 84% of all welfare recipients, as of 2016.
Denmark also spends inordinate sums on crime committed by immigrants—8 of the 9 ethnic groups most represented in Danish prisons are non-Western immigrant groups, specifically Islamic immigrants.
In fact, non-ethnic Danes are 2-3 times more likely to commit crimes than Danes, and if their crime profile is anything like that of immigrants in Sweden, then it is likely that the crimes they commit are also generally more serious in nature.
Likewise, healthcare costs for immigrants groups are proving significant. For example, 40% of patients in Denmark’s largest mental health hospital have immigrant backgrounds.
Why might this be? Because of the prevalence of consanguineous marriages among Islamic immigrants, which greatly increases the risk of mental health problems.
In fact, when accounting for population, Muslim immigrants to Denmark are over-represented in mental health facilities by 1,300%
Regardless of these ancillary statistics, the takeaway point is that non-Western immigration has not benefited Denmark economically, nor has immigration benefited Germany—despite what open-borders advocates claim.
Leave a Reply
6 Comments on "Non-Western Immigrants Consume 59% Of Denmark’s Tax Surplus"
I’d like to see what the stats look like for other countries with much larger immigrant populations, because Denmark is relatively homogeneous.
If it’s this bad there, I can only imagine what it’d look like in France or Germany.
That being said, I don’t think the results are really that surprising: everyone knows (or at least they should) that the only group in society that actually pays a net surplus in taxes are white men. Even women are a net drain on government spending as a whole.
Immigrants as a group are a massive dependent class, for the most part, even after generations.
In fairness I think East Asain men are likely also net contributes as seen by their universal low crime rates and their generally high incomes for example out earning whites in the USA.
I suspect you’re right, since the study I saw just lumped all immigrant groups together. It’s probably a little more nuanced like you say. But I’d say it’s mostly true.
Half of what you say seems to make sense, but the other half is just pure bullshit.
I agree that the Rothschilds and the other banking families are the ones behind mass immigration to the West (not just of Muslims, but all 3rd worlders), and they’re doing it specifically to divide and conquer. It’s pretty obvious that unity comes through strength, not division.
But as for the rest of it, fuck every inch of you.
Migrants aren’t without guilt for raping and killing white women because of “white supremacy” and “imperialism”. Every man is accountable for his own sins. The guilty should be executed in public for all to see, the rest should be deported for supporting barbarism.
Also, the fact that you’re actually defending in-breeding, and pretending that it doesn’t have any negative effects makes me think you’re just an in-bred Muslim pretending that his shit doesn’t stink.
50% of all Islamic marriages are between 1st cousins, same for their parents, and grandparents. Generations actually. Even after 1 generation there is a big risk for mental health problems, a lower IQ, and genetic defects. After a few generations it’s a given.
So pointing out that Muslims make up a giant percentage of all retards isn’t at all racist, it’s a fact. If you marry your cousins for generations, you’ll probably have retarded kids. That’s just a fact. Also, people who’re inbred are way more likely to be low-IQ, and violent. This isn’t related to race, it’s just a basic biological fact: the same reason dogs that are too-inbred are always fucked up.
Bringing a bunch of inbred people who come from a culture that hasn’t changed since the Middle Ages, who don’t have any endogenous technology or science, and putting them into the modern world is not only a dumb idea, it’s cruel to both sides, if we’re being honest.
Also, the fact that you think racial difference is just “skin color” is laughable anyways. You don’t think people that evolved separately for 60,000+ years, and have different admixtures from other human species (like neanderthal, denesovan), are at all different? Come on man, anyone with a working brain knows that racial differences are pretty profound. That doesn’t mean we can’t coexist, but denying the obvious is just lunacy.